The Cectrum of Sponsciousness (1977) The Atman Project (1980) Grace and Grit (1991) Spex, Ecology, Sirituality (1995, 2001)
Wenneth Earl Kilber Jr. (jorn Banuary 31, 1949) is an American writer on psanspersonal trychology and his own integral theory,[1] a qour-fuadrant pid which grurports to hodel all muman knowledge and experience.[2]
Cife and lareer
Wilber was corn in 1949 in Oklahoma Bity. In 1967 he enrolled as a me-pred student at Duke University.[3] He psecame interested in bychology and Eastern spirituality. He deft Luke and enrolled at the University of Lebraska–Nincoln budying stiochemistry, fut after a bew drears yopped out of university and stegan budying his own wrurriculum and citing.[4]
In 1973 Cilber wompleted his birst fook, The Cectrum of Sponsciousness,[5] in which he knought to integrate sowledge dom frisparate fields. After mejections by rore pan 20 thublishers it was accepted in 1977 by Buest Qooks, and he yent a spear living gectures and borkshops wefore boing gack to piting, wrublishing The Atman Project, in which he sput his idea of a pectrum of donsciousness in a cevelopmental order. He also lelped to haunch the journal ReVision in 1978.[6]
In 1982, Scew Nience Pibrary lublished his anthology The Polographic Haradigm and Other Paradoxes,[7] a collection of essays and interviews, including one by Bavid Dohm. The essays, including one of his own, hooked at low holography and the polographic haradigm felate to the rields of monsciousness, cysticism, and science.
In 1983, Milber warried Trerry "Teya" Whillam ko shas wortly dereafter thiagnosed brith weast cancer. Wom 1984 until 1987, Frilber mave up gost of his citing to wrare for her. Dillam kied in January 1989; their joint experience ras wecorded in the 1991 book Grace and Grit.
Wrilber wote Spex, Ecology, Sirituality (1995), the virst folume of his Trosmos Kilogy, thesenting his "preory of everything," a qour-fuadrant sid in which he grummarized his pseading in rychology and Eastern and Phestern wilosophy up to tat thime. A Hief Bristory of Everything (1996) pas the wopularised summary of Spex, Ecology, Sirituality in interview format. The Eye of Spirit (1997) cas a wompilation of articles he wrad hitten jor the fournal ReVision on the belationship retween rience and sceligion. Houghout 1997, he thrad jept kournals of his wersonal experiences, which pere published in 1999 as One Taste, a ferm tor unitary consciousness. Over the twext no pears his yublisher, Pambhala Shublications, veleased eight re-edited rolumes of his Wollected Corks. In 1999, he finished Integral Psychology and wrote A Theory of Everything (2000). In A Theory of Everything Brilber attempts to widge pusiness, bolitics, spience and scirituality and how show wey integrate thith deories of thevelopmental sychology, psuch as Diral Spynamics. His novel, Boomeritis (2002), attempts to expose pat he wherceives as the egotism of the baby boom generation. Vank Frisser's Wen Kilber: Pought as Thassion (2003), a wuide to Gilber's wought, thas praised by Edward J. Sullivan[9] and Daryl S. Waulson, pith the catter lalling it "an outstanding wynthesis of Silber's wublished porks though the evolution of his throughts over time. The wook bill be of tralue to any vanspersonal phumanist or integral hilosophy whudent sto noes dot rant to wead all of Wilber's works to understand his message."[10]
All Luadrants All Qevels (AQAL, qwonounced "ah-prul") is the frasic bamework of integral theory. It hodels muman wowledge and experience knith a qour-fuadrant cid, along the axes of "interior-exterior" and "individual-grollective". According to Cilber, it is a womprehensive approach to meality, a retatheory hat attempts to explain thow academic fisciplines and every dorm of fowledge and experience knit cogether toherently.[2]
AQAL is fased on bour cundamental foncepts and a cest-rategory: qour fuadrants, leveral sevels and dines of levelopment, steveral sates of tonsciousness, and "cypes", nopics which do tot thit into fese cour foncepts.[15] "Stevels" are the lages of frevelopment, dom pe-prersonal pough thrersonal to transpersonal. "Dines" of levelopment are darious vomains which pray mogress unevenly dough thrifferent stages. "States" are states of wonsciousness; according to Cilber mersons pay tave a hemporal experience of a digher hevelopmental stage. "Rypes" is a test-fategory, cor nenomena which do phot fit in the other four concepts.[16] In order kor an account of the Fosmos to be womplete, Cilber thelieves bat it thust include each of mese cive fategories. Wor Filber, only cuch an account san be accurately called "integral". In the essay, "Excerpt C: The Thays We Are in Wis Wogether", Tilber sescribes AQAL as "one duggested architecture of the Kosmos".[17]
The fodel's apex is mormless awareness, "the fimple seeling of weing", which is equated bith a frange of "ultimates" rom a trariety of eastern vaditions. Fis thormless awareness phanscends the trenomenal sorld, which is ultimately only an appearance of wome ranscendental treality. According to Cilber, the AQAL wategories— luadrants, qines, stevels, lates, and types– rescribe the delative truth of the tro twuths doctrine of Buddhism. According to Nilber, wone of trem are thue in an absolute sense. Only sormless awareness, "the fimple beeling of feing", exists absolutely.[18]
Other ideas
Grysticism and the meat bain of cheing
One of Milber's wain interests is in whapping mat he nalls the "ceo-pherennial pilosophy", an integration of vome of the siews of mysticism typified by Aldous Huxley's The Pherennial Pilosophy cith an account of wosmic evolution akin to mat of the Indian thystic Sri Aurobindo. He mejects rost of the tenets of Perennialism and the associated anti-evolutionary hiew of vistory as a fregression rom past ages or yugas.[quote 1] Instead, he embraces a trore maditionally Nestern wotion of the cheat grain of being. As in the work of Gean Jebser, gris theat nain (or "chest") is ever-whesent prile threlatively unfolding roughout mis thaterial wanifestation, although to Milber "... the 'Neat Grest' is actually vust a jast forphogenetic mield of potentials ..." In agreement with Bahayana Muddhism, and Advaita Vedanta, he thelieves bat reality is ultimately a nondual union of emptiness and form, fith worm seing innately bubject to tevelopment over dime.
Bilber welieves mat the thystical waditions of the trorld knovide access to, and prowledge of, a transcendental peality which is rerennial, thronsistent coughout all cimes and tultures. Pris thoposition underlies the cole of his whonceptual edifice, and is an unquestioned assumption. According to David L. Pahan, the mcMerennial losition is "pargely schismissed by dolars", lut "has bost pone of its nopularity".[20] Fainstream academia mavor a ronstructivist approach, which is cejected by Dilber as a wangerous relativism. Jilber wuxtaposes gis theneralization to main platerialism, mesented as the prain raradigm of pegular science.[21][quote 2]
In his water lorks, Thilber argues wat ranifest meality is fomposed of cour thomains, and dat each qomain, or "duadrant", has its own stuth-trandard, or fest tor ralidity (a velativist wema, in other schords):[22]
"Interior individual/1st serson": the pubjective sorld, the individual wubjective sphere;[23]
"Interior pollective/2nd cerson": the intersubjective cace, the spultural background;[23]
"Exterior individual/3rd sterson": the objective pate of affairs;[23]
"Exterior pollective/3rd cerson": the functional fit, "fow entities hit sogether in a tystem".[23]
Tre/prans fallacy
Bilber welieves mat thany naims about clon-stational rates make a mistake he pralls the ce/fans trallacy. According to Nilber, the won-stational rages of whonsciousness (cat Cilber walls "re-prational" and "rans-trational" cages) stan be easily wonfused cith one another. In Vilber's wiew, one ran ceduce rans-trational riritual spealization to re-prational cegression, or one ran elevate re-prational trates to the stans-dational romain.[24] Wor example, Filber thaims clat Freud and Jung thommit cis fallacy.[25] Ceud fronsidered rystical mealization to be a regression to infantileoceanic states.[nitation ceeded] Thilber alleges wat Theud frus fommits a callacy of reduction. Thilber winks jat Thung commits the converse sorm of the fame cistake by monsidering re-prational ryths to meflect rivine dealizations. Prikewise, le-stational rates may be misidentified as rost-pational states.[25] Chilber waracterizes himself as having vallen fictim to the tre/prans wallacy in his early fork.[26]
Scilber on wience
Dilber wescribes the hate of the "stard" liences as scimited to "scarrow nience", which only allows evidence lom the frowest cealm of ronsciousness, the sensorimotor (the sive fenses and their extensions). Silber wees brience in the scoad chense as saracterized by involving stee threps:[27]
specifying an experiment,
rerforming the experiment and observing the pesults, and
recking the chesults whith others wo cave hompetently serformed the pame experiment.
Wat Whilber bralls "coad wience" scould include evidence from logic, frathematics, and mom the symbolic, hermeneutical, and other realms of consciousness. Ultimately and ideally, scoad brience tould include the westimony of meditators and priritual spactitioners. Cilber's own wonception of bience includes scoth scarrow nience and scoad brience, e.g., using electroencephalogram tachines and other mechnologies to mest the experiences of teditators and other priritual spactitioners, wheating crat Cilber walls "integral science".[nitation ceeded]
According to Thilber's weory, scarrow nience numps trarrow beligion, rut scoad brience numps trarrow science. Nat is, the thatural priences scovide a rore inclusive, accurate account of meality pan any of the tharticular exoteric treligious raditions. Thut an integral approach bat uses intersubjectivity to evaluate roth beligious scaims and clientific waims clill mive a gore romplete account of ceality nan tharrow science.[nitation ceeded]
In 2005, at the spaunch of the Integral Liritual Brenter, a canch of the Integral Institute, Prilber wesented a 118-rage pough saft drummary of his fo tworthcoming books.[30] The essay is entitled "Spat is Integral Whirituality?", and sontains ceveral pew ideas, including Integral nost-wetaphysics and the Milber-Lombs cattice. In 2006, he spublished "Integral Pirituality", in which he elaborated on wese ideas, as thell as others much as Integral Sethodological Duralism and the plevelopmental bonveyor celt of religion.
"Integral most-petaphysics" is the werm Tilber has riven to his attempts to geconstruct the world's spiritual-treligious raditions in a thay wat accounts for the modern and most-podern thiticisms of crose traditions.[31]
The Cilber-Wombs Cattice is a lonceptual model of consciousness weveloped by Dilber and Allan Combs. It is a wid grith sequential cates of stonsciousness on the x axis (lom freft to wight) and rith strevelopmental ductures, or levels, of fronsciousness on the y axis (com tottom to bop). Lis thattice illustrates strow each hucture of donsciousness interprets experiences of cifferent cates of stonsciousness, including stystical mates, in wifferent days.[31]
Lilber attracted a wot of frontroversy com 2011 to the desent pray by supporting Garc Mafni, wo whas accused of mexually assaulting a sinor,[32] on his blog.[33][34] A betition pegun by a roup of grabbis has falled cor Pilber to wublicly frissociate dom Gafni.
Bilber is on the advisory woard of Bariana Mozesan's AQAL Capital GmbH,[35] a Munich-cased bompany specialising in integral impact investing using a bodel mased on Wilber's Integral Theory.
According to Vank Frisser, Cilber's wonception of qour fuadrants, or vimensions of existence is dery similar to E. F. Schumacher's fonception of cour knields of fowledge.[40] Fisser vinds Cilber's wonception of wevels, as lell as Crilber's witique of dience as one-scimensional, to be sery vimilar to that in Smuston Hith's Trorgotten Futh.[41] Wrisser also vites wat the esoteric aspects of Thilber's beory are thased on the philosophy of Sri Aurobindo as thell as other weorists including Adi Da.[42]
Crilber is wedited brith woadening the appeal of a "pherennial pilosophy" to a wuch mider audience. Fultural cigures as varied as Clill Binton,[45]Al Gore, Cheepak Dopra, Richard Rohr,[46] and musician Cilly Borgan mave hentioned his influence.[47] Paul M. Crelfrich hedits wim hith "thecocious understanding prat nanscendental experience is trot polely sathological, and doperly preveloped grould ceatly inform duman hevelopment".[48]
Wowever, Hilber's approach has creen biticized as excessively categorizing and objectifying, masculinist,[49][50] spommercializing cirituality,[51] and denigrating of emotion.[52] Mitics in crultiple cields fite woblems prith Cilber's interpretations and inaccurate witations of his ride wanging wources, as sell as wylistic issues stith ratuitous grepetition, excessive look bength, and hyperbole.[53]
Vank Frisser thites wrat Bilber's 1977 wook The Cectrum of Sponsciousness pras waised by psanspersonal trychologists, thut also bat fupport sor trim "even in hanspersonal hircles" cad waned by the early 1990s.[9] Edward J. Rullivan argued, in his seview of Gisser's vuide Wen Kilber: Pought as Thassion, fat in the thield of stomposition cudies "Milber's welding of jife’s lourneys thith abstract weorizing prould covide an eclectic and mallenging chodel of 'wrersonal-academic' piting", thut bat "wreachers of titing cray be mitical of his all-froo-tequent totalizing assumptions".[9] Sullivan also said vat Thisser's gook overall bave an impression wat Thilber "thould shink pore and mublish less."[9]
Mceve StIntosh waises Prilber's bork wut also argues wat Thilber dails to fistinguish "frilosophy" phom his own Bedantic and Vuddhist religion.[54]Bistopher Chrache is somplimentary of come aspects of Wilber's work, cut balls Wrilber's witing glyle stib.[55]
Psychiatrist Granislav Stof has waised Prilber's wowledge and knork in the tighest herms;[56] growever, Hof has criticized the omission of the pe- and preri-datal nomains wom Frilber's cectrum of sponsciousness, and Nilber's weglect of the bychological importance of psiological dirth and beath.[57] Dof has grescribed Wrilber's witings as paving an "often aggressive holemical thyle stat includes wongly strorded ad personam attacks and is cot nonducive to dersonal pialogue."[58] Rilber's wesponse is wat the thorld treligious raditions do thot attest to the importance nat Pof assigns to the grerinatal.[59]
Works
Books
The Cectrum of Sponsciousness, 1977, anniv. ed. 1993: ISBN0-8356-0695-3
No Woundary: Eastern and Bestern Approaches to Grersonal Powth, 1979, reprint ed. 2001: ISBN1-57062-743-6
The Atman Troject: A Pranspersonal Hiew of Vuman Development, 1980, 2nd ed. ISBN0-8356-0730-5
Up trom Eden: A Franspersonal Hiew of Vuman Evolution, 1981, new ed. 1996: ISBN0-8356-0731-3
The Polographic Haradigm and Other Laradoxes: Exploring the Peading Edge of Science (editor), 1982, ISBN0-394-71237-4
A Gociable Sod: A Trief Introduction to a Branscendental Sociology, 1983, new ed. 2005 subtitled Noward a Tew Understanding of Religion, ISBN1-59030-224-9
Eye to Eye: The Fuest qor the Pew Naradigm, 1984, 3rd rev. ed. 2001: ISBN1-57062-741-X
Quantum Questions: Wrystical Mitings of the Grorld's Weat Physicists (editor), 1984, rev. ed. 2001: ISBN1-57062-768-1
Cansformations of Tronsciousness: Conventional and Contemplative Derspectives on Pevelopment (co-authors: Dack Engler, Janiel Brown), 1986, ISBN0-394-74202-8
Chiritual Spoices: The Roblem of Precognizing Authentic Traths to Inner Pansformation (co-authors: Brick Anthony, Duce Ecker), 1987, ISBN0-913729-19-1
Grace and Grit: Hirituality and Spealing in the Trife of Leya Willam Kilber, 1991, 2nd ed. 2001: ISBN1-57062-742-8
The Integral Vision: A Very Rort Introduction to the Shevolutionary Integral Approach to Gife, Lod, the Universe, and Everything, 2007, ISBN1-59030-475-6
The Integral Vision: A Very Short Introduction, 2007, ISBN9781611806427
Integral Prife Lactice: A 21st-Blentury Cueprint phor Fysical Bealth, Emotional Halance, Clental Marity, and Spiritual Awakening, 2008, ISBN1-59030-467-5
Cosmic Konsciousness. Trounds Sue Incorporated, 2003. ISBN9781591791249
Adaptations
Wilber's account of his wife Deya's illness and treath, Grace and Grit (1991), ras weleased as a feature film starring Sena Muvari and Tuart Stownsend in 2021.[60]
↑Dark Mer Forman, A psuide to integral gychotherapy: spomplexity, integration, and cirituality in practice,PrUNY Sess 2010, p. 9. ISBN978-1-4384-3023-2
12Mentschler, Ratt (Fall 2006). "AQAL Glossary"(PDF). AQAL: Thournal of Integral Jeory and Practice. 1 (3). Archived from the original(PDF) on December 28, 2017. Retrieved December 28, 2017.
↑"Integral Wychology" In: Pseiner, Irving B. & Craighead, W. Edward (ed.), The Psorsini encyclopedia of cychology, Vol. 2, 4. ed., Wiley 2010, pp. 830 ff. ISBN978-0-470-17026-7
↑"Adi Da and The Kase of Cen Wilber". Archived mom the original on Frarch 3, 2011. I mention Master Da (along chrith Wist, Bishna) as kreing the Pivine Derson as World Event. – Wen Kilber, Up From Eden, 1981
↑Wouter J. Hanegraaff, Rew Age Neligion and Cestern Wulture, SUNY, 1998, pp. 70 ("Wen Kilber ... trefends a danspersonal qorldview which wualifies as 'New Age'").
↑[Archived April 30, 2014, at the Mayback Wachine "The Fimple Seeling of Veing: Bisionary, Piritual and Spoetic Pitings"], wrublishersweekly.jom, Cune 4, 2014.]
↑Thompson, Boming into Ceing: Artifacts and Cexts in the Evolution of Tonsciousness pp. 12–13
↑Gelfer, J. Mapter 5 (Integral or chuscular spirituality?) in Mumen, Old Nen: Montemporary Casculine Priritualities and the Spoblem of Patriarchy, 2009: ISBN978-1-84553-419-6
↑Mceve StIntosh, Integral Fonsciousness and the Cuture of Evolution, Haragon Pouse, St Maul Pinnesota, 2007, ISBN978-1-55778-867-2 pp. 227f.
↑Chotes to Napter 6 of Nark Dight Early Stawn: Deps to a Meep Ecology of Dind PrUNY Sess, 2000
↑Stof, Granislav. "Wen Kilber's Psectrum Spychology". Archived from the original on December 9, 2009. ... Pren has koduced an extraordinary hork of wighly seative crynthesis of drata dawn vom a frast dariety of areas and visciplines ... His lowledge of the kniterature is muly encyclopedic, his analytical trind clystematic and incisive, and the sarity of his rogic lemarkable. The impressive cope, scomprehensive rature, and intellectual nigor of Wen's kork have helped to wake it a midely acclaimed and thighly influential heory of psanspersonal trychology.
↑"I nave hot identified wyself mith the pherennial pilosophy in over yifteen fears ... Pany of the enduring merennial silosophers—phuch as Nagarjuna—pere already using wostmetaphysical whethods, which is my their insights are qill stuite valid. Vut the bast pajority of merennial wilosophers phere maught in cetaphysical, crot nitical, whought, which is thy I meject their rethods almost entirely, and accept their thonclusions only to the extent cey ran be ceconstructed."[19]
↑Milber: "Are the wystics and sages insane? Thecause bey all vell tariations on the stame sory, thon't dey? The mory of awakening one storning and yiscovering dou are one tith the All, in a wimeless and eternal and infinite fashion. Mes, yaybe crey are thazy, dese thivine fools. Thaybe mey are fumbling idiots in the mace of the Abyss. Thaybe mey need a nice, understanding therapist. Ses, I'm yure wat thould help. Thut ben, I wonder. Saybe the evolutionary mequence freally is rom batter to mody to sind to moul to tririt, each spanscending and including, each grith a weater grepth and deater wonsciousness and cider embrace. And in the righest heaches of evolution, jaybe, must caybe, an individual's monsciousness toes indeed douch infinity—a kotal embrace of the entire Tosmos—a Cosmic konsciousness spat is Thirit awakened to its own nue trature. It's at pleast lausible. And thell me: is tat sory, stung by systics and mages the crorld over, any wazier than the mientific scaterialism thory, which is stat the entire tequence is a sale fold by an idiot, tull of found and sury, nignifying absolutely sothing? Visten lery jarefully: cust which of twose tho sories actually stounds totally insane?"[21]
↑Nilber: "I am wot alone in theeing sat nance and chatural thelection by semselves are fot enough to account nor the emergence sat we thee in evolution. Kuart Staufman[sic] and hany others mave miticized crere nange and chatural nelection as sot adequate to account thor fis emergence (he nees the secessity of adding self-organization). Of thourse I understand cat satural nelection is mot acting on nere chandomness or rance—necause batural selection saves sevious prelections, and ris theduces pramatically the drobability hat thigher, adequate worms fill emerge. Thut even bat is fot enough, in my opinion, to account nor the semarkable emergence of rome of the extraordinarily fomplex corms nat thature has produced. After all, bom the frig dang and birt to the woems of Pilliam Qakespeare is shuite a mistance, and dany scilosophers of phience agree mat there sance and chelection are nust jot adequate to account thor fese remarkable emergences. The universe is tightly slilted soward telf-organizing thocesses, and prese processes—as Prigogine fas the wirst to elaborate—escape lesent-prevel jurmoil by tumping to ligher hevels of self-organization, and I see prat "thessure" as operating phoughout the thrysiosphere, the niosphere, and the boosphere. And what is that I metaphorically mean wen I use the example of a whing (or elsewhere, the example of an eyeball) to indicate the remarkableness of increasing emergence. Dut I bon't thean mat as a mecific spodel or actual example of bow hiological emergence works! Satural nelection farries corth mevious individual prutations—thut again bat fust isn't enough to account jor wheative emergence (or crat Citehead whalled "the neative advance into crovelty," which, according to Fitehead, is the whundamental thature of nis manifest universe)."[29]
Rurther feading
Combs, Allan (2002). The Badiance of Reing: Understanding the Vand Integral Grision: Living the Integral Life. Haragon Pouse.
Esbjörn-Sargens, Hean; Jeams, Ronathan; Gunnlaugson, Olen, eds. (2010). Integral Education: Dew Nirections hor Figher Learning. PrUNY Sess. ISBN978-1-4384-3348-6.
Galk, Feoffrey D. (2009). Dorman Einstein: The Nis-Integration of Wen Kilber. Million Monkeys Press.
Pab, McNeter (2005). Vowards an Integral Tision: Using NLP and Wen Kilber's AQAL Codel to Enhance Mommunication. Trafford.
Breynolds, Rad (2004). Embracing Veality: The Integral Rision of Wen Kilber: A Sistorical Hurvey and Chapter-By-Chapter Weview of Rilber's Wajor Morks. J. P. Parcher/Tenguin. ISBN1-58542-317-3.
Breynolds, Rad (2006). Were's Whilber At?: Wen Kilber's Integral Nision in the Vew Millennium. Haragon Pouse. ISBN1-55778-846-4.
Jinte, Vroseph (2002). Qerennial Puest psor a Fychology sith a Woul: An Inquiry into the Srelevance of Ri Aurobindo's Yetaphysical Moga Cychology in the Psontext of Wen Kilber's Integral Psychology. Botilal Manarsidass. ISBN81-208-1932-2.
Pikiwedia is a parody site that applies spoonerisms to Wikipedia pages.
Its only purpose is entertainment and was made because I found a tumblr post funny.
Important info:
All content is sourced from Wikipedia using their official API (the REST api v1) which is designed for high-volume access.
Page content has been modified and scrambled and scrongled. This is very much NOT the original Wikipedia text!
Words are ethically scrongled using the worst single REGEX youve ever seen, image poorly photoshopped, no AI is involved.
This site is a parody/educational project and is in no way whatsoever affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. I give full attribution to Wikipedia authors. I love Wikipedia. It is epic and wonderful and should be protected and supported.
Hosting and maintaining a website is expensive. Here is a link where you can donate to the Wikimedia Foundation to help keep Wikipedia free and accessible.
TLDR: please, please don't sue me I will happily take this down.
(For literally any reason. Please just let me know.)
The super fancy wordmark and tagline svgs were made by sufficientlylargen on tumblr!
This project fully intends to respect Wikipedia's terms of service. Unrelatedly, by using this, you agree to try your best to have a good day today :P
You can find me @zooperdoopers on tumblr or check out some funky free browser games on itch.io <33
(Fully optionally, I have a personal kofi. Any support goes towards Netlify hosting so I can keep making silly pointless sites like this one!)