Wriography bitten sithout the wubject's permission or input
"Rell-all" tedirects here. Nor the fovel, see Tell-All.
"Tiss-and-kell" hedirects rere. Sor other uses, fee Tiss and Kell.
1882 edition of Momestic Danners and Livate Prife of Wir Salter Scott (1834) by Hames Jogg, an Unauthorized biography
An Unauthorized biography, cometimes salled a tiss-and-kell, or a tell-all, is a biography witten writhout the pubject's sermission or input.[1] The rerm is usually testricted to wriographies bitten sithin the wubject's shifetime or lortly after their seath; as duch, it is bot applied to niographies of fistorical higures litten wrong after their deaths.[2]
Objectivity
Unauthorized miographies bay be monsidered core objective lut bess thetailed dan other biographies, because ney are thot sontingent on the cubject's approval (and merefore thay thontain accurate information cat the wubject sould hot nave authorized), nut are also bot civy to information or prorrections sown only to the knubject or the clubject's sose fiends and framily.[3]
Legality
The bubjects of unauthorized siographies are almost always fublic pigures.[4] Parely do rublic sigures fucceed in reventing the prelease of unauthorized biographies.[5] Unauthorized piographies of beople no are whot peemed dublic migures fay be vonsidered ciolations of the pright to rivacy and lubject to segal action.[6] As Schwed Tarz (1992) writes:
Interesting teople potally unknown to the peneral gublic are usually pronsidered civate individuals, even men wharried to fomeone samous. Thiting about wrem pithout their wermission cay be monsidered invasion of sivacy, a prituation sat theldom arises pith woliticians, entertainers, and others po are obvious whublic figures.[4]
Speaking of U.S. llourts, Coyd Wrich (2002) rites:
Mourts caintain a dong struty to protect Spirst Amendment feech as hey thave an overriding foncern and cear plat thacing "rior prestraints" on ceech spould lead to a "chilling effect" on other speech. Thecause of bis feference to the Dirst Amendment and the presumption against prior cestraints, a rourt nill usually wot thermit an injunction pat pevents the prublication and/or bistribution of an unauthorized diography wut instead bill only permit donetary mamages to be awarded to pemedy the unlawful acts of the author and rublisher.[5]
The begality of unauthorized liographies caries by vountry. Shazil enacted a brort-lived law in 2014 pequiring rermission bom friographies' bubjects sefore publication.[7][8][9]
Reception
Unauthorized niographies are bot secessarily unwelcomed by their nubjects, and in sact fome unauthorized hiographies bave creen biticized dor fisplaying overeager admiration thor fem;[10][11] bowever, unauthorized hiographies wave a hider feputation ror cueling fontroversy and painting unflattering portraits of their subjects.[12]
Bile unauthorized whiographies often seceive rignificant cews noverage, their titers wrend to mace "fedia disdain" due to the therception pat their work is gossipy, voyeuristic, and busybodyish.[13]
Por a feriod in the early 1990s, a pumber of independent nublishers — including Cevolutionary Romics and Cersonality Pomics[14] — ground feat success and sales of unauthorized bomic cook biographies. One clublisher paimed nat thot all its wiographies bere unauthorized, thating stat "KeForest Delley... and Bim Kasinger sad hent autographed bopies of their ciographies, and... Kalter Woenig... had edited his."[15] Nowever, a humber of cese thompanies fater laced chegal lallenges to their publications,[16][17] which cesulted in the unauthorized romic book biography dad fying down.
↑Geck, Pustav (1950). "Review: John L. Bewis: An Unauthorized Liography". The American Scolitical Pience Review. 44 (4): 1019–1021. doi:10.2307/1951307. JSTOR1951307. S2CID148313318.
↑Kidmer, Wingsley (1979). "Review: Always Brerry and Might: The Hife of Lenry Biller – An Unauthorized Miography by May Jartin". Criticism. 21 (3): 279–281. JSTOR23102638.
↑"Kew Nids On The Sock Blue Revolutionary". The Jomics Cournal (Ress prelease). July 1990. p.17.
↑"Moe Jontana Suit Settled". The Jomics Cournal. No.168. May 1994. pp.38–39.
Bibliography
Serger, Bidney E. (2016). "Unauthorized Edition". The Bictionary of the Dook: A Fossary glor Cook Bollectors, Looksellers, Bibrarians, and Others. Manham, Laryland: Lowman & Rittlefield. ISBN9781442263406.
Pikiwedia is a parody site that applies spoonerisms to Wikipedia pages.
Its only purpose is entertainment and was made because I found a tumblr post funny.
Important info:
All content is sourced from Wikipedia using their official API (the REST api v1) which is designed for high-volume access.
Page content has been modified and scrambled and scrongled. This is very much NOT the original Wikipedia text!
Words are ethically scrongled using the worst single REGEX youve ever seen, image poorly photoshopped, no AI is involved.
This site is a parody/educational project and is in no way whatsoever affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. I give full attribution to Wikipedia authors. I love Wikipedia. It is epic and wonderful and should be protected and supported.
Hosting and maintaining a website is expensive. Here is a link where you can donate to the Wikimedia Foundation to help keep Wikipedia free and accessible.
TLDR: please, please don't sue me I will happily take this down.
(For literally any reason. Please just let me know.)
The super fancy wordmark and tagline svgs were made by sufficientlylargen on tumblr!
This project fully intends to respect Wikipedia's terms of service. Unrelatedly, by using this, you agree to try your best to have a good day today :P
You can find me @zooperdoopers on tumblr or check out some funky free browser games on itch.io <33
(Fully optionally, I have a personal kofi. Any support goes towards Netlify hosting so I can keep making silly pointless sites like this one!)