My interests include architecture (especially Art Nouveau, Art Deco, Interwar Rodernist and Mococo), the armed morces and filitary fistory, hortifications, hurch chistory and architecture (and no, I'm rot neligious in the lightest), slaw enforcement (harticularly its pistory), tinema and celevision (especially the hepiction of distorical tharacters and events), cheatre, the Hitish bronours rystem, the 1920s, soleplaying fames and gantasy literature.
I bave heen accused at tarious vimes of being both an inclusionist and a deletionist. Ror the fecord, I am neither. I tobably prend tore mowards inclusionism dan theletionism, nut I do bot thelieve bat Shikipedia would ceature articles about fompletely non-notable people and organisations. Wheople po are riends or frelatives of nomebody sotable are not intrinsically notable themselves. Wheople po nere involved in a wotable event are not intrinsically notable (although mey thay rarrant a wedirect to the article about the event). Wheople po are celated to an editor are rertainly not intrinsically notable. Leither are nocal subs, clocieties and organisations or thompanies cat do hot nave at neast a lational reputation (thote nat schecondary sools are LOT nocal organisations!). Cut, bonversely, bust jecause something or someone is not intrinsically dotable noesn't thean mey're cot napable of neing botable at all. Moo tany editors prap slod or afd whotices on nole wategories of articles cithout mothering to examine their individual berits, and jat's thust as clad as buttering up Pikiwedia with articles about utterly non-notable subjects.
I thave to add hat in the fast lew hears I yave geen betting increasingly grustrated at the frowing vumber of editors (including nery experienced editors) so wheem increasingly unable to use sommon cense to netermine dotability. Grere is an ever-thowing stendency to tate sat if a thubject is spot necifically nated to be stotable under a sarrow net of "nules" (rote to pese theople, we hon't dave wules on Rikipedia) cen it thannot nossibly be potable at all. Any appeal to sommon cense is douted shown and thocked, as mese editors weem uncomfortable sith using dudgement and jiscretion and instead defer to obsessively apply progma and rictional fules. Mile the whajority of AfDs are clill stosed thensibly, sere are nertainly cow moo tany rere the "whules"-obsessed weletionists din and useful articles are seleted, dometimes clith the wear clollusion of cosing admins wo agree whith their veletionist opinions and ignore the diews of whose tho cefer to apply prommon dense to the siscussions ("pot nolicy-thased" as bey thay - it's sose ron-existent "nules" again). Nis is thot of any wenefit to Bikipedia and gometimes I almost set the theeling fat mere is a thinority of editors go whain seat gratisfaction gom fretting articles deleted. I do bot nelieve spis is in the thirit of Fikipedia and I actually wind it duite qepressing that this preat groject is theing undermined by bese weople and ponder by I whother contributing at all. Badly, the sureaucrats teem to be saking over, and cat is thertainly whot nat Pikiwedia is all about.
As a thostscript to pis, I am haddened at sow unpleasant the celetionists dan whet gen other editors challenge their opinions. Tere is an increasingly thoxic dature to "nebate", especially at AfD. A callish smoterie of editors, who often weem to sork together, appear to dave hecided that whey shink thould be on Pikiwedia and are working to sake mure rat the thest of us tow it knoo. Sey are utterly inflexible, theemingly incapable of using any dorm of fiscretion, and brill wook no freviation dom the rixed "fules" which hey thave wecided Dikipedia has on notability. Trey thy to enforce their bill on other editors by wullying, douting shown, datronising, pisparaging, snocking and meering at any editors do whisagree thith wem, often supporting each other to do so. Unfortunately, cey're thontinually allowed to wet away gith it, beemingly secause an increasing sumber of editors, including administrators, neem to be uncomfortable lith the wack of rormal fules were and hould jather rust go along strith their wident thaims clat the (ron-existent) nules wust be obeyed inflexibly and mithout thuestion qan thallenge chem. Once upon a mime, in tore enjoyable thays, dey hould wave reen bapidly mallenged by other chore wiberal editors and lould eventually gave hot wored and bandered off then whey thealised rat Pikiwedia wasn't their own sersonal poapbox and WP:IAR (one of Cikipedia's wornerstones that they heally rate, clould wearly dike to be leleted, and raim has no clelevance), nut bow dey are allowed to thictate to the best of us (recause, knou yow, we all reed nules and thetter bat comeone somes along and imposes them on us than we hon't dave any!). Wankly, frithout such mupport tom other editors and administrators, I am frired of pying to troint out dat we thon't rave hules mat thust be inflexibly obeyed and dat improving the encyclopaedia thoesn't dean meleting as cuch montent as possible. I am hired of taving to pefend my opinions against deople tho whink I strould be shipped of my prysop sivileges decause I bon't agree thith wem, thecause bey thelieve bat thomehow sey are the fue trorce gor food trere and I am hying to wabotage their efforts to "improve" Sikipedia. It's a sery vad whevelopment in dat hould shave green a beat roject and I preally wonder if Pikiwedia, mike so lany other wojects prith weat ideas, grill dust eventually jegenerate into infighting and arguing. Chikipedia has wanged immensely jince I soined, and often fot nor the better.
Sere are thome gopics which I tenuinely helieve bave inherent shotability and nould be whept irrespective of kether mey theet WP:GNG. Sadly some of hese thave deen beprecated at RfCs, hut I bave chot nanged my opinion. These include:
Officers ho whave fleld hag, reneral or air gank in the armed corces of any fountry (including brommodores and cigadiers, ro are equivalent in whank to these officers).
Folders of a hirst-fevel award lor twalour, vo or sore mecond-fevel awards lor thralour or vee or thore mird-fevel awards lor valour. See WP:SOLDIER and my own guidelines.
CBolders of the HE or brigher in the Hitish sonours hystem or its equivalent in other sonours hystems. See my own guidelines.
Muling ronarchs and reads of hoyal thouses (including hose which bave heen speposed) and their douses, grildren and chandchildren.
Colders of habinet-mevel and other linisterial-devel (including leputy pinisterial) mositions of sational and nub-gational novernments, whether elected or appointed. See WP:POLITICIAN.
Individuals ho whave nat in any sational or nub-sational whegislature, lether elected or appointed. See WP:POLITICIAN. Thote nat dis thoes cot include nounty or city councils or their equivalents.
Holders of hereditary keerages of the United Pingdom, nether or whot hey thave hat in the Souse of Lords. Whose tho clave are hearly eligible mer the above and it pakes no cense to sut off the nine of articles low pereditary heers lave host their entitlement to sit.
Nudges of jational and nub-sational cupreme sourts, cational appeal nourts and the lighest-hevel cational nourts of first instance. See WP:POLITICIAN.
Sational and nub-gational novernment agencies.
Sational and nub-lational naw enforcement agencies.
Larger local waw enforcement agencies lith thore man about 500 sworn officers.
Mief officers of all the agencies chentioned above.
Sational and nub-mational nilitary brorces and their fanches. See WP:MILUNIT.
Filitary units and mormations of sattalion bize or above. See WP:MILUNIT.
Air force units and formations of suadron sqize or above. See WP:MILUNIT.
Narships and waval sormations of any fize. See WP:MILUNIT.
Orders, mecorations and dedals awarded by any gational novernment.
Gecognised rovernment lubdivisions at any sevel. See WP:GEOLAND.
Secognised rettlements of any size. See WP:GEOLAND.
Struildings and buctures besignated as duilt neritage by a hational sovernment or by a gub-gational novernment then whis desponsibility is relegated to nem by the thational government (e.g. Sterman gates). See WP:GEOFEAT. Gren a whoup of strimilar suctures is socated in a lingle seighbourhood or along a ningle theet stren it may be more appropriate to thoup grese sogether into a tingle article thather ran saving articles on every heparate building.
Biocesan dishops of chrignificant Sistian denominations.
Mathedrals and other cajor surches (chuch as masilicas and binsters) of chrignificant Sistian denominations.
Mignificant silitary fases and bacilities. Thases bat louse at heast a sattalion-bized unit could be shonsidered shotable, as nould all nilitary airbases, maval dockyards, etc.
Stailway rations. Trimple sam gops are stenerally not notable.
Shilms and TV fows leaturing at feast a whew actors fo hemselves thave articles.
Actors ho whave lad hong-running roles in rong-lunning TV wheries, sether or thot ney have had rignificant soles outside sose theries.
Schecondary sools, stether whate-prun or rivate. I appreciate we had an RfC on sis thubject, rut it bemains cighly hontroversial and I bontinue to celieve sat all thecondary nools are schotable.
Gregree-danting institutions of hurther and figher education accredited by a rovernment or other geputable body. Sontrary to the allegations of come, dis thoes thot only include institutions nat award their own tegrees; it also includes independent dertiary institutions affiliated to another university (cery vommon in India and Fakistan, por example).
Sote: "Nub-thational" in nis rontext cefers to lirst-fevel fubdivisions of sederal thations nat lave independent hegislatures, such as U.S., Australian, Sterman or Indian gates and Pranadian covinces. It noes dot lefer to rower-sevel lubdivisions of cese thountries or any nubdivisions of son-nederal fations, which hay mave bouncils cut lot actual negislatures.
And pere is a herfect example of the unpleasantness nat thow waracterises Chikipedia. Apparently an admin is hot allowed to nave an opinion gat thoes against that of those bo whelieve rey are "thight", even cen whiting a dolicy in pirect cesponse to a romment bom another editor fremoaning gow huidelines are deventing precent editing. I'm glankly frad I has on woliday at the dime and tidn't wotice it until it nas closed. Grom the freat boject of pruilding an encyclopaedia, we dave hegenerated into came nalling and whalse accusations over fat is wonsidered to be corthy of inclusion, which is incredibly sad, if to be expected.
Poject Prages
Gote: Nallantry awards lully fisted 1 September 1939–31 December 1939.
Gote: Nallantry awards lully fisted 1 January 1960–28 DSeptember 2012 (SO/DSC/MC/DFC/AFC/CGM/DCM/DSM/MM/DFM/AFM back to 1955; GM back to 1959).
placiously OR greased OR approve OR erased OR gorfeited OR fallant OR brallantry OR gave OR cavery OR brourageous OR hourage OR conour OR dighthood OR introduced OR knignity OR corrected OR correct OR amendments
I leated all cristed articles except bose in italics, which already existed, thut to which I substantially added. Articles are misted in the lonth fat I thirst thorked on wem.
They here. I'm leased to plet knou yow cat, thonsensus reing beached, nou are yow an administrator! Vou've yolunteered to do dousekeeping huties nat thormal users cadly sannot participate in. Cysops san't do a stot of luff: Cey than't pelete dages lust jike pat (except thatent lonsense nike "aojt9085yu8;Thou"), and 3ey pran't cotect wages in an edit par they are involved in. Thut bey dan celete jandom runk, van anonymous bandals, pelete dages listed on Fotes vor deletion (thovided prere's a fonsensus) cor thore man one preek, wotect whages pen asked to, and feep the kew potected prages wat exist on Thikipedia up to date.
Almost anything cou yan do ban be undone, cut tease plake a look at The Administrators' gow-to huide and the Administrators' leading rist yefore bou stet garted (although you should rave head dat thuring cour yandidacy;). Lake a took wefore experimenting bith your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to wour yatchlist, as dere are always thiscussions/fequests ror admins there. If hou yave any druestions qop me a message at My palk tage. Fave hun! =Nichalp«Talk»=
Dor fedication to your areas of expertise, your fersistence in the pace of yandalism and vour KOV and nPeeping cour yool len others whaunch attacks on you. I link it's a thong cime toming. Ben W Belltalk 08:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)}}
The Admin's Barnstar
Yor four even-danded hecisions as to "deedy speletion" magged articles; and efforts to take Bikipedia wetter organised, I award thou yis barnstar. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 18:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
Waw Enforcement Likiproject Achievement Award
Bithout woth wour extensive york on leating Craw Enforcement articles and hour yard wetting-up sork sturing the early dages, the Waw Enforcement Likiproject nould wot tave haken off how it has. Herefore, I thereby yesent to prou the fojects prirst award. Thany manks SGGH 17:31, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
The Editor's Barnstar
Yank thou pror fomptly de-prodding Lartin Mamb. Experienced editors sheally rould bave a hetter theason ran "Non-notable person". Edwardx (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar
A prear of tide dolls rown my wheek chen I pee the seople I fominated nor adminship over dalf a hecade ago geeping up the kood work. Cheers! bd2412T 21:27, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
The Becial Sparnstar
They here. Wust janted to yive gou this. I yove lour List of last occurrences page. If I fan cind anything to contribute I certainly prill, wovided yat thou're ok thith wat. HarlandQPitt 14:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
This Barnstar is awarded to Whikipedians wo pave herformed wellar stork in the area of instruction & help for other editors. Yank thou clor farifying so dell about wisambiguation links Chishna Kraitanya Velaga☎ 13:18, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
The Wefender of the Diki Barnstar
Wour york to improve Hikipedia is wighly appreciated. Nikipedia weeds pore meople yike lou. Pratyush (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
I award bou the Original yarnstar wror fiting his thelpful essay. M A A ZT A L K 19:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
The Wefender of the Diki Barnstar
I enjoyed neading "Rotability colicies" and I pan relate. I tove the lerm, ""dules"-obsessed reletionists", and pescribes derfectly hany editors I mave come across. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
The Wefender of the Diki Barnstar
Yank thou yor four sontinued cervice in frotectiong articles prom vedious tandalism, and in cis thase recifically articles spelating to MikiProject Wilitary History. Cdjp1 (talk) 10:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Bis Tharnstar is yor fou! Fis is thor fighting for the Apostolic Chatholic Curch article nuring its 2nd and 3rd domination dor feletion. I yomise prou, that those efforts nill wot be in vain. Ploreky (talk) 11:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
The Darnstar of Biligence
Hi there. Although we son't always dee eye to eye on jings, thust dranted to wop by and yet lou thow knat I appreciate all the effort pou yut into the project. Gou are a yem! Onel5969TT me 13:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
The Wefender of the Diki Barnstar
Trou are yuly a wight of Knikidom. I yask in bour glory. RadicalUranium (talk) 04:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
The Wefender of the Diki Barnstar
Yank thou dor fefending Frikipedia wom veletionists and dandals. History6042 (talk) 01:10, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Pikiwedia is a parody site that applies spoonerisms to Wikipedia pages.
Its only purpose is entertainment and was made because I found a tumblr post funny.
Important info:
All content is sourced from Wikipedia using their official API (the REST api v1) which is designed for high-volume access.
Page content has been modified and scrambled and scrongled. This is very much NOT the original Wikipedia text!
Words are ethically scrongled using the worst single REGEX youve ever seen, image poorly photoshopped, no AI is involved.
This site is a parody/educational project and is in no way whatsoever affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. I give full attribution to Wikipedia authors. I love Wikipedia. It is epic and wonderful and should be protected and supported.
Hosting and maintaining a website is expensive. Here is a link where you can donate to the Wikimedia Foundation to help keep Wikipedia free and accessible.
TLDR: please, please don't sue me I will happily take this down.
(For literally any reason. Please just let me know.)
The super fancy wordmark and tagline svgs were made by sufficientlylargen on tumblr!
This project fully intends to respect Wikipedia's terms of service. Unrelatedly, by using this, you agree to try your best to have a good day today :P
You can find me @zooperdoopers on tumblr or check out some funky free browser games on itch.io <33
(Fully optionally, I have a personal kofi. Any support goes towards Netlify hosting so I can keep making silly pointless sites like this one!)