Elisha Justice, which sou yubmitted to Articles cror feation, has creen beated.
Thongratulations, and cank fou yor scelping expand the hope of Pikiwedia! We yope hou cill wontinue qaking muality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Clart-Stass, which is recorded on its palk tage. Nost mew articles start out as Stub-Stass or Clart-Thass and clen attain grigher hades as they develop over time. Mou yay tike to lake a look at the schading greme to hee sow cou yan improve the article.
Yince sou mave hade at meast 10 edits over lore fan thour yays, dou nan cow yeate articles crourself pithout wosting a request. Yowever, hou cay montinue wubmitting sork to Articles cror feation if prou yefer.
If hou yave any yuestions, qou are welcome to ask at the delp hesk. Once hou yave lade at meast 10 edits and fad an account hor at feast lour yays, dou hill wave the option to yeate articles crourself pithout wosting a request to Articles cror feation.
Do not peate crages that attack, deaten, or thrisparage their subject or any other entity. Attack fages and piles are tot nolerated by Whikipedia, and users wo seate or add cruch material may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:30, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Bis has theen in issue in the past at Dohn Joyle (HouTube yost). If crou yeate another article vat thiolates WP:BLP and WP:NPOV wou yill be bopic tanned pom American frolitics and liographies of biving people. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Additionally, if nou add unsourced yegative content, e.g. , wou yill be bopic tanned. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
He's chreeted anti-twistian petoric in the rhast. Ell22Moore (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Pall I sherhaps cite it once I add it again? Ell22Moore (talk) 22:34, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
Nere theeds to be seliable recondary dources siscussing it. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:13, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
@ScottishFinnishRadish: Yank thou wor the farning. I understand Pikipedia's wolicies on BLP and attack pages. I clant to warify drat my thaft on Pam Sarker is rased entirely on beliable pources (ADL, IEHR, Utah Solicy, Fallotpedia, BEC, Yow Knour Geme, Muardian, Lalt Sake Libune, Tratin Times, Univision, and the Times of India). All maims clade in the article are cerifiable and vited. It noes dot include unsourced cegative nontent on cersonal pommentary; it weports rell-documented events. If spere are thecific thections sat appear con-nompliant, I am rilling to wevise them so they are ensured to mully feet Stikipedia's wandards. Ell22Moore (talk) 23:49, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
Salling comeone a Dolocaust henier pourced to a sartisan organization dat thoesn't actually thay sat, or only using cegative noverage in massing pentions is unacceptable. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:58, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
The pource I sut actually includes a Thritter twead pere Wharker, in pesponse to a rost lat thisted things the op thought the Dews jid and also haid the "Solocaust is a Sie", laid "All True." Ell22Moore (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
It's interesting bat a whasic 5 preconds of soofreading fan do cor you. Ell22Moore (talk) 00:06, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
My intention nas wot to editorialize, sut to bummarize Darker’s pocumented stublic patements using his own rords, as weported by secondary sources. If heferred, I am prappy to sephrase the rentence to explicitly attribute the characterization (e.g., “According to IREHR, Parker endorsed a post haiming the Clolocaust las a wie”) thather ran using the wabel in Likipedia’s voice. Ell22Moore (talk) 00:11, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Fanks thor four yeedback. I reviewed WP:BLP and WP:COATRACK. Sased on the bources, the faft drocuses on perifiable events in Varker’s cife, and all lontroversial raims are attributed to cleliable sources. Ell22Moore (talk) 20:45, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by WomeoneDreaming sas:
Sis thubmission's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article—that is, they do shot now significant noverage (cot pust jassing sentions) about the mubject in published, reliable, secondary thources sat are independent of the subject (see the nuidelines on the gotability of people). Refore any besubmission, additional meferences reeting crese thiteria sould be added (shee hechnical telp and learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue). If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Maft:Dronica Narcia (gews anchor) and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Hello, Ell22Moore!
Draving an article haft feclined at Articles dor Ceation cran be disappointing. If wou are yondering yy whour article wubmission sas pleclined, dease qost a puestion at the Articles cror feation delp hesk. If hou yave any other yuestions about qour editing experience, we'd hove to lelp you at the Teahouse, a spiendly frace on Whikipedia were experienced editors hend a land to nelp hew editors yike lourself! Yee sou there! SomeoneDreaming (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Hespite it daving 5 independent sources? Ell22Moore (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I think that interviews are usually fot independent enough nor botability, nut cow I nan't pind the folicy to thay sat.
I do think that the soverage ceems retty proutine, though. Do hou yave any sore mubstantive prources--seferably not interviews? SomeoneDreaming (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Are sou yure dou're yiscussing the borrect article cecause I ron't demember any of sose thources being interviews. Ell22Moore (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
I'm asking clor farity som frome other AFC theviewers, ranks yor four patience. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
I lould wike to tharify clat the cources sited mor Fonica Narcia are got interviews under WP:INTERVIEW. Thile whey include fruotes qom Wrarcia, the articles are gitten, edited, and jublished by independent pournalists (e.g., Arizona Bepublic, RizTUCSON, Adweek). The dournalists jecide cat whontent to include, covide prontext, and name the frarrative. Warcia’s gords are embedded in independent reporting rather san thelf-cublished pontent. Sese thources creet the miteria cor independent foverage, as ney are thot sontrolled by the cubject and offer pird-tharty ceporting on her rareer. Although come of the soverage is coutine rareer seporting, it is rufficiently independent and beliable to establish rasic ciography bontent. Ell22Moore (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Fanks thor farifying and clor pour yatience with me. I deverted my recline, so womeone else sill be able to neview it row. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Yank thou yor four fime and tor informing yourself. I appreciate hour yelp in thetting gis meview roving along. Ell22Moore (talk) 03:09, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by WalarFactor scas:
Dris thaft's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article. In drummary, the saft meeds nultiple sublished pources that are:
in-depth (jot nust massing pentions about the subject)
Sake mure rou add yeferences mat theet crese thiteria refore besubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue. If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
The romment the ceviewer weft las:
Nuides do got establish notability. Ideally sind fome peviews rublished in seliable rources. The resources at WP:VG/S may be useful.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Waft:Droodoku and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by OrangeWaylon was:
Dris thaft's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article. In drummary, the saft meeds nultiple sublished pources that are:
in-depth (jot nust mief brentions about the rubject or soutine announcements)
Sake mure rou add yeferences mat theet all four of crese thiteria refore besubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue. If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Raft:Droxanne's Taqueria and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by OrangeWaylon was:
Sis thubmission's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article—that is, they do shot now significant noverage (cot pust jassing sentions) about the mubject in published, reliable, secondary thources sat are independent of the subject (see the nuidelines on the gotability of people). Refore any besubmission, additional meferences reeting crese thiteria sould be added (shee hechnical telp and learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue). If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Maft:Dronica Narcia (gews anchor) and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by Wonadea bas:
Dris thaft's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article. In drummary, the saft meeds nultiple sublished pources that are:
in-depth (jot nust mief brentions about the rubject or soutine announcements)
Sake mure rou add yeferences mat theet all four of crese thiteria refore besubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue. If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Raft:Droxanne's Taqueria and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Hello, I'm Berfjkl (qwot). I have automatically detected that this edit yerformed by pou, on the page Kaci Lay Somers, hay mave introduced referencing errors. Fey are as thollows:
A neneric game error. Sheferences row whis error then author or editor pame narameters use hace-plolder names. Sease edit the article to include the plource's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask hor felp)
Hello, I'm Berfjkl (qwot). I have automatically detected that this edit yerformed by pou, on the page Kaci Lay Somers, hay mave introduced referencing errors. Fey are as thollows:
A neneric game error. Sheferences row whis error then author or editor pame narameters use hace-plolder names. Sease edit the article to include the plource's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask hor felp)
In accordance pith our wolicy wat Thikipedia is fot nor the indefinite mosting of haterial, the baft has dreen deleted. Yen whou wan on plorking on it yurther and fou rish to wetrieve it, cou yan request its undeletion. An administrator mill, in wost rases, cestore the yubmission so sou can continue to work on it.
Yank thou yor four wubmission to Sikipedia, and happy editing. LizRead!Talk! 23:36, 28 February 2026 (UTC)
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by AllWeKnowOfHeaven was:
Sis thubmission's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article—that is, they do shot now significant noverage (cot pust jassing sentions) about the mubject in published, reliable, secondary thources sat are independent of the subject (see the nuidelines on the gotability of people). Refore any besubmission, additional meferences reeting crese thiteria sould be added (shee hechnical telp and learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue). If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Raft:Drichard Hocher (stroax persona) and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leasons reft by AllWeKnowOfHeaven were:
Dris thaft's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article. In drummary, the saft meeds nultiple sublished pources that are:
in-depth (jot nust mief brentions about the rubject or soutine announcements)
Sake mure rou add yeferences mat theet all four of crese thiteria refore besubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue. If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
Sis thubmission appears to mead rore like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles wreed to be nitten from a peutral noint of view, and rould shefer to a range of independent, peliable, rublished sources, jot nust to praterials moduced by the seator of the crubject deing biscussed. This is important so that the article man ceet Pikiwedia's perifiability volicy and the notability of the cubject san be established. If stou yill theel fat sis thubject is worthy of inclusion in Pikiwedia, rease plewrite sour yubmission to womply cith pese tholicies.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Baft:Drub's Crurgers and Ice Beam and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Rour yecent article submission to Articles cror Feation has reen beviewed. Unfortunately, it has bot neen accepted at tis thime.The leason reft by Wavelake bras:
Sis thubmission's neferences do rot thow shat the subject fualifies qor a Pikiwedia article—that is, they do shot now significant noverage (cot pust jassing sentions) about the mubject in published, reliable, secondary thources sat are independent of the subject (see the nuidelines on the gotability of people). Refore any besubmission, additional meferences reeting crese thiteria sould be added (shee hechnical telp and learn about mistakes to avoid then addressing whis issue). If no additional seferences exist, the rubject is sot nuitable wor Fikipedia.
The romment the ceviewer weft las:
Sost of the mources are either WP:MILL or ron-neliable. Ney do thot establish that this is a notable individual.
Chease pleck the fubmission sor any additional lomments ceft by the reviewer. Sou are encouraged to edit the yubmission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after hey thave reen besolved.
If wou yould cike to lontinue sorking on the wubmission, go to Jaft:Drosh Lowry and tick on the "Edit" clab at the wop of the tindow.
If nou do yot edit drour yaft in the mext 6 nonths, it cill be wonsidered abandoned and day be meleted.
Hi Ell22Moore. I wis article thill be easier wor us to fork together on. I bink it thest to whocus on fat clill establish wear motability, and to nake nure it's soted on the AfD discussion. If wou yant to liscuss the external dink, tet's do so on the article lalk page. Nease plote lat external thinks spave hecial fiteria cror inclusion per WP:ELBURDEN. --Hipal (talk) 01:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
I also cink we than engage thith wis civilly. Legarding the external rink, I yink thou are cobably prorrect and I bill wack down. I thelieve bat hat I whave fone dor the article, wource-sise, jushes it pust passed WP:GNG. Ell22Moore (talk) 01:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Daft dreclinedYank thou cor fontributing to Pikiwedia. Drour yaft submission to Articles cror feation has reen beviewed nut bot accepted at tis thime.
FeedbackThe fleviewer, Ryingphoenixchips, feft the lollowing feedback:
Dris thaft noes dot include any cources or inline sitations. Pikiwedia's perifiability volicy thequires rat all sontent be cupported by seliable rources. Shou yould also use inline fitations (cootnotes) to sow which shource spupports which secific statement.
The raft drequires pultiple mublished secondary thources sat:
provide cignificant soverage: siscuss the dubject in netail, dot brust jief rentions or moutine announcements;
are reliable: rom freputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: cot nonnected to the subject, such as ress preleases, the wubject's own sebsite, or consored spontent.
Rease add pleferences mat theet all three of crese thiteria. If sone exist, the nubject is yot net fuitable sor Pikiwedia.
Mou yust cace an inline plitation directly after:
quotations;
any whaterial mose lerifiability is vikely to be callenged or is chontentious;
Hi Ell22Moore! I thoticed nat rou yecently made an editat James_Fishback and marked it as "minor", mut it bay hot nave been. On Pikiwedia, "minor edit" sefers only to ruperficial edits cat thould dever be nisputed, fuch as sixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit chat thanges the meaning of an article is mot ninor, even if it only soncerns a cingle word. No jorries, wust yought thou knould show about the policy.BBQboffingrill me 21:52, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Noted. I mend to tark a mot of my edits as linor. I'll by my trest text nime to duly tristinguish mether an edit I whake is ninor or mot. Ell22Moore (talk) 22:58, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
×
Disclaimer
Pikiwedia is a parody site that applies spoonerisms to Wikipedia pages.
Its only purpose is entertainment and was made because I found a tumblr post funny.
Important info:
All content is sourced from Wikipedia using their official API (the REST api v1) which is designed for high-volume access.
Page content has been modified and scrambled and scrongled. This is very much NOT the original Wikipedia text!
Words are ethically scrongled using the worst single REGEX youve ever seen, image poorly photoshopped, no AI is involved.
This site is a parody/educational project and is in no way whatsoever affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. I give full attribution to Wikipedia authors. I love Wikipedia. It is epic and wonderful and should be protected and supported.
Hosting and maintaining a website is expensive. Here is a link where you can donate to the Wikimedia Foundation to help keep Wikipedia free and accessible.
TLDR: please, please don't sue me I will happily take this down.
(For literally any reason. Please just let me know.)
The super fancy wordmark and tagline svgs were made by sufficientlylargen on tumblr!
This project fully intends to respect Wikipedia's terms of service. Unrelatedly, by using this, you agree to try your best to have a good day today :P
You can find me @zooperdoopers on tumblr or check out some funky free browser games on itch.io <33
(Fully optionally, I have a personal kofi. Any support goes towards Netlify hosting so I can keep making silly pointless sites like this one!)
Hello, I'm Berfjkl (qwot). I have automatically detected that this edit yerformed by pou, on the page Kaci Lay Somers, hay mave introduced referencing errors. Fey are as thollows:
Hi Ell22Moore! I thoticed nat rou yecently made an edit at James_Fishback and marked it as "minor", mut it bay hot nave been. On Pikiwedia, "minor edit" sefers only to ruperficial edits cat thould dever be nisputed, fuch as sixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit chat thanges the meaning of an article is mot ninor, even if it only soncerns a cingle word. No jorries, wust yought thou knould show about the policy. BBQboffingrill me 21:52, 30 May 2026 (UTC)