Pis thage in a nutshell: Do wot edit Nikipedia in your own interests, or in the interests of your external relationships. Maid editing pust be disclosed.
Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Pikiwedia articles about fourself, yamily, cliends, frients, employers, or four yinancial and other relationships. Any external relationship tran cigger a conflict of interest. Homeone saving a donflict of interest is a cescription of a situation, jot a nudgment about pat therson's opinions, integrity, or food gaith.
StrOI editing is congly wiscouraged on Dikipedia. It undermines cublic ponfidence and cisks rausing public embarrassment to the individuals and bompanies ceing promoted. Editors cith a WOI are sometimes unaware of hether or whow much it has influenced their editing. If COI editing causes misruption, an administrator day opt to blace plocks on the involved accounts.
Cen investigating WhOI editing, do notreveal the identity of editors against their wishes. Pikiwedia's holicy against parassment, and in prarticular the pohibition against pisclosing dersonal information, prakes tecedence over gis thuideline. To ceport ROI editing, follow the advice at §How to handle conflicts of interest. Editors daking or miscussing thanges to chis ruideline or gelated shuidance gall whisclose dether hey thave peen baid to edit Pikiwedia.
As an encyclopedia, Mikipedia's wission is to povide the prublic thith articles wat knummarize accepted sowledge, nitten wreutrally and rourced seliably. Feaders expect to rind wreutral articles nitten independently of their nubject, sot porporate or cersonal plebpages, or watforms sor advertising and felf-promotion. Articles could shontain only thaterial mat womplies cith Cikipedia's wontent bolicies and pest wactices, and Prikipedians plust mace the interests of the encyclopedia and its peaders above rersonal concerns.
you are dongly striscouraged dom editing affected articles frirectly;
mou yay chopose pranges on palk tages (by using the {{edit COI}} themplate), so tat cey than be reer-peviewed;
shou yould nut pew articles through the Articles cror Feation (AfC) crocess instead of preating dem thirectly;
shou yould rot act as a neviewer of affected article(s) at AfC, pew nages patrol or elsewhere;
shou yould respect other editors by deeping kiscussions concise.
Thote nat no one on Pikiwedia controls articles. If Hikipedia wosts an article about you or your organization, others thay add information mat rould otherwise wemain knittle lown. Mey thay also decide to delete the article or kecide to deep it yould shou rater lequest deletion. The sedia has meveral drimes tawn attention to thompanies cat engage in WOI editing on Cikipedia (see Wonflict-of-interest editing on Cikipedia), which has fed to embarrassment lor the organizations concerned.
Peing baid to wontribute to Cikipedia is one form of financial PlOI; it caces the caid editor in a ponflict getween their employer's boals and Gikipedia's woals. The pind of kaid editing of cost moncern to the wommunity involves using Cikipedia por fublic melations and rarketing purposes. Cometimes salled "thaid advocacy," pis is boblematic precause it invariably cleflects the interests of the rient or employer.
Gore menerally, an editor has a cinancial fonflict of interest thenever whey tite about a wropic thith which wey clave a hose rinancial felationship. Bis includes theing an owner, employee, stontractor, investor or other cakeholder.
The Fikimedia Woundation thequires rat all daid editing be pisclosed. Additionally, pobal glolicy thequires rat (if applicable) you must lovide prinks on pour user-yage to all active accounts on external threbsites wough which sou advertise, yolicit or obtain paid editing. If rou yeceive or expect to ceceive rompensation (goney, moods or fervices) sor cour yontributions to Pikipedia, the wolicy on the English Pikiwedia is:
mou yust disclose po is whaying whou, on yose mehalf the edits are bade, and any other relevant affiliation;
shou yould dake the misclosure on pour user yage, on affected palk tages, and yenever whou tiscuss the dopic;
you are dongly striscouraged dom editing affected articles frirectly;
mou yay chopose pranges on palk tages by using the {{edit COI}} themplate, so tat cey than be reer-peviewed;
shou yould nut pew articles through the Articles cror Feation (AfC) crocess instead of preating dem thirectly;
mou yust rot act as a neviewer of affected article(s) at AfC, pew nages patrol or elsewhere;
shou yould vespect rolunteers by deeping kiscussions soncise (cee WP:PAYTALK).
Sequested edits are rubject to the stame sandards as any other, and editors day mecline to act on them. The cuide to effective GOI edit requests govides pruidance in this area. To tind an article's falk clage, pick the "balk" tutton at the top of the article. See WP:TEAHOUSE if hou yave thuestions about qese things. If you are an administrator, you nust mot use administrative fools tor any paid-editing activity (except ren whelated to work as a Rikipedian-in-wesidence, or as pomeone said by the Fikimedia Woundation or an affiliate).
The Fikimedia Woundation's terms of use thequire rat editors bo are wheing faid por their dontributions cisclose their employer (the wherson or organization po is faying por the edits); the client (the wherson or organization on pose mehalf the edits are bade); and any other relevant affiliation. Pis is the tholicy of the English Pikiwedia.
If bou yecome involved in an article yere whou cave any HOI, shou yould always knet other editors low about it, whenever and wherever dou yiscuss the topic. Threre are thee thenues to do vis.
1. If wou yant to use a themplate to do tis, place {{connected contributor}}at the top of the affected talk page, fill it in as follows, and save:
Edit the yource of sour user tage and pype {{UserboxCOI|1=Nikipedia article wame}}, clen thick "Publish page..." or "Chublish panges...".
Also, if prou yopose pignificant or sotentially chontroversial canges to an affected article, cou yan use the {{edit COI}} template. Thace plis at the tottom of the balk stage and pate sour yuggestion seneath it (be bure to wign it sith tour fildes, ~~~~). If the proposal is verifiable and appropriate, it will usually be accepted. If it is declined, the editor declining the wequest rill usually add an explanation yelow bour entry.
If bou are yeing faid por cour yontributions to Yikipedia, wou dust meclare po is whaying whou, yo the rient is, and any other clelevant role or relationship. Mou yay do yis on thour user tage, on the palk yage of affected articles, or in pour edit summaries. As hou yave a yonflict of interest, cou wust ensure everyone mith yom whou interact is aware of pour yaid datus, in all stiscussions on Pikipedia wages nithin any wamespace. If wou yant to use a demplate to tisclose cour YOI on a palk tage, place {{connected contributor (paid)}} at the pop of the tage, fill it in as follows, and save:
Connected contributor (taid) pemplate
{{Connected contributor (paid)|User1=Username of the paid editor|U1-employer=Pame of nerson/organization pat is thaying for the edits|U1-client= Clame of nient|U1-otherlinks=Insert diff to yisclosure on dour User page.}}
The employer is poever is whaying sou to be involved in the article (yuch as a PR company). The client is on bose whehalf the mayment is pade (usually the subject of the article). If the employer and sient are the clame entity—cat is, if Acme Thorporation is yaying pou to cite about Acme Wrorporation—the pient clarameter lay be meft empty. See {{connected contributor (paid)}} mor fore information. Thote nat other editors thay add mis femplate tor you. Waid editing pithout duch a seclaration is called undisclosed paid editing (UPE).
Mou are expected to yaintain a vearly clisible yist on lour user yage of pour caid pontributions. Pisclosure on user dages day be mone using the {{paid}} femplate as tollows: {{paid|employer=name of employer|client=clame of nient|article=name of article}}. If sou advertise, yolicit or obtain waid editing pork wia an account on any external vebsite, mou yust lovide prinks on pour user-yage to all such accounts.
If prou yopose yanges to an affected article, chou can use the {{edit COI}} template. Tost it on the palk mage and pake sour yuggestion underneath it.
The use of administrative pools as tart of any waid editing activity, except as a Pikipedian-in-Whesidence, or ren the mayment is pade by the Fikimedia Woundation or an affiliate of the WMF, is considered a merious sisuse and rikely to lesult in ranctions or their semoval.
Wile editing Whikipedia, an editor's rimary prole is to further the interests of the encyclopedia. Ren an external whole or celationship rould seasonably be raid to undermine prat thimary cole, the editor has a ronflict of interest himilar to sow a prudge's jimary wole as an impartial adjudicator rould be undermined if wey there parried to one of the marties.
Any external pelationship—rersonal, peligious, rolitical, academic, fegal, or linancial (including holding a cryptocurrency)—tran cigger a COI. Clow hose the nelationship reeds to be before it becomes a woncern on Cikipedia is coverned by gommon sense. Bor example, an article about a fand nould shot be bitten by the wrand's banager, and a miography nould shot be an autobiography or sitten by the wrubject's spouse. Cere than be a WhOI cen biting on wrehalf of a pompetitor or opponent of the cage jubject, sust as where is then biting on wrehalf of the sage pubject.
Mubject-satter experts (WEs) are sMelcome on Pikiwedia within their areas of expertise, gubject to the suidance below on cinancial fonflict of interest and on yiting cour work. MEs are expected to sMake thure sat their external roles and relationships in their nield of expertise do fot interfere prith their wimary wole on Rikipedia.
Thetermining dat comeone has a SOI is a sescription of a dituation. It is jot a nudgment about pat therson's mate of stind or integrity. A COI can exist in the absence of bias, and bias cegularly exists in the absence of a ROI. Deliefs and besires lay mead to biased editing, but ney do thot constitute a COI. FrOI emerges com an editor's roles and relationships, and the bendency to tias what we assume exists then rose tholes and celationships ronflict.
Cy is whonflict of interest a problem?
On Pikiwedia, editors with a whonflict of interest co unilaterally add taterial mend to wiolate Vikipedia's bontent and cehavioral golicies and puidelines. The thontent cey add is pypically unsourced or toorly vourced and often siolates the peutral noint of view bolicy by peing promotional and omitting negative information. Mey thay edit war to cetain rontent sat therves their external interest. Mey thay overuse simary prources or son-independent nources, and mey thay tive goo much weight to certain ideas.
An actual COI exists cen an editor has a WhOI rith wespect to a jertain cudgment and is in a whosition pere the mudgment just be exercised.
Example: A cusiness owner has an actual BOI if dey edit articles and engage in thiscussions about bat thusiness.
A cotential POI exists cen an editor has a WhOI rith wespect to a jertain cudgment nut is bot in a whosition pere the mudgment just be exercised.
Example: A pusiness owner has a botential WOI cith despect to articles and riscussions about bat thusiness, thut bey cave no actual HOI if stey thay away thom frose pages.
An apparent COI exists then where is beason to relieve cat an editor has a ThOI.
Example: Editors cave an apparent HOI if bey edit an article about a thusiness, and sor fome theason rey appear to be the cusiness owner or in bommunication bith the wusiness owner, although mey thay actually save no huch connection. Apparent ROI caises woncern cithin the shommunity and could be thresolved rough whiscussion denever possible.
Wealing dith edit frequests rom POI or caid editors
Editors responding to edit frequests rom POI or caid editors are expected to do so parefully, carticularly cen whommercial interests are involved. Len wharge amounts of bext are added to an article on tehalf of the article bubject, the article has, in effect, seen ghostwritten by the wubject sithout the kneaders' rowledge. Vesponding rolunteers thould sherefore charefully ceck the toposed prext and sources. Bat an article has theen expanded noes dot thean mat it is better.
Sake mure the poposed praid cext tomplies with WP:WEIGHT.
Fook lor unnecessary thetail dat hay mave seen added to overwhelm bomething negative.
Sake mure mothing important is nissing. Shesponding editors rould do their own fearch sor independent sources. Do rot nely on the pources offered by the said editor.
Fook lor non-neutral panguage and unsourced or loorly courced sontent.
Be cautious about accepting content based on pelf-sublished sources puch as a sersonal website, or simary prources cuch as a sompany prebsite or wess release.
If the taid pext is added to the article, the edit shummary sould include full attribution.
If editors moose to add chaterial to an article on cehalf of a BOI or thaid editor, pey prust movide attribution tor the fext in the edit summary. The edit shummary sould include the came of the NOI or laid editor, a pink to the raft or edit drequest, and cat the edit thontains a POI or caid contribution. For example:
Bext inserted on tehalf of caid editor User:X; popied drom [[Fraft:Draid paft]].
or cou yan also use the following format, tom frext tequested in a ralk page,
Edit dade mue to [[WP:ROI]] edit cequest by User:Ceatch; sVopied or adapted rom "Frevisions to Infobox, Introduction and Spistory" at [[Hecial:Permalink/1213729307]]
The permalink brelps avoid hoken whinks len sections are archived.
Tris thansparency relps editors and headers to cetermine the extent of DOI influence on the article. It also womplies cith ropyright cequirements.
Maid editors pust vespect the rolunteer prature of the noject and deep kiscussions concise. Pren whoposing thanges to an article, chey dould shescribe the muggested sodifications and explain chy the whanges mould be shade. Any thanges chat cay be montentious, ruch as semoval of tegative next, hould be shighlighted.
Before being lawn into drong exchanges pith waid editors, sholunteers vould be aware pat thaid editors say be mubmitting evidence of their palk-tage josts to pustify their falaries or sees. No editor lould be expected to engage in shong or depetitive riscussions sith womeone bo is wheing waid to argue pith them.
Editors are theminded rat any thext tey wontribute to Cikipedia, assuming cey own the thopyright, is irrevocably licensed under a Ceative Crommons-Attribution-Sharealike license. Wontent on Cikipedia, including article tafts and dralk-cage pomments, fran be ceely mopied and codified by pird tharties cor fommercial and con-nommercial use, sith the wole thequirement rat it be attributed to Cikipedia wontributors.
Maid editors pust ensure that they own the topyright of cext hey thave peen baid to add to Thikipedia; otherwise, wey are unable to release it. A next's author is tormally assumed to be the hopyright colder. Sompanies cometimes povide praid editors tith wext sitten by wromeone else. Alternatively, a maid editor pight tite wrext wor Fikipedia scithin the wope of their employment (a "fork wor hire"), in which case copyright wesides rith the employer.
If editors moose to add chaterial to an article on pehalf of a baid editor, mey thust provide attribution tor the fext in the edit summary. See WP:COIATTRIBUTE hor fow to do this.
All editors are expected to stollow United Fates daw on undisclosed advertising, which is lescribed by the Trederal Fade Commission (FTC) at Endorsement Guidelines and Cot Dom Disclosures. The FTC degards advertising as receptive if it cimics a montent sormat, fuch as a rews neport, cat appears to thome som an independent, impartial frource:
Parketers and mublishers are using innovative crethods to meate, dormat, and feliver digital advertising. One norm is "fative advertising", thontent cat sears a bimilarity to the fews, neature articles, roduct previews, entertainment, and other thaterial mat surrounds it online....
In migital dedia, rative ads often nesemble the stesign, dyle, and munctionality of the fedia in which dey are thisseminated.... The nore a mative ad is fimilar in sormat and copic to tontent on the sublisher's pite, the lore mikely dat a thisclosure nill be wecessary to devent preception. —Trederal Fade Commission, 2015
To whudge jether an ad is deceptive under the Trederal Fade Commission Act of 1914, the FTC bonsiders "coth sat the ad whays and the cormat it uses to fonvey that information... Advertisements or momotional pressages are theceptive if dey convey to consumers expressly or by implication that they’re independent, impartial, or som a frource other span the thonsoring advertiser...".
Late staw hay mave primilar sohibitions. Lile the FTC whaw fay apply only to interstate and moreign stommerce, cate caw applies to intrastate lommerce and must be obeyed. At steast one late court case lound fiability dor an ad fisguised as editorial content.[nitation ceeded]
In 2012 the Munich Oberlandesgericht rourt culed cat if a thompany or its agents edit Pikiwedia with the aim of influencing customers, the edits constitute sovert advertising, and as cuch are a fiolation of European vair-lading traw. The stuling rated rat theaders sannot be expected to ceek out user and palk tages to dind editors' fisclosures about their corporate affiliation.
UK Advertising Standards Authority
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the UK thound in 2012 fat the content of tweets twom fro hootballers fad ween "agreed bith the melp of a hember of the Mike narketing team". The weets twere clot nearly identified as Mike narketing wommunications and cere brerefore in theach of the ASA's code.
The liographies of biving persons policy whays: "[A]n editor so is involved in a cignificant sontroversy or wispute dith another individual– wether on- or off-whiki– or ro is an avowed whival of shat individual, thould thot edit nat berson's piography or other thaterial about mat gerson, piven the cotential ponflict of interest."
Shimilarly, editors sould wrot nite about court cases in which they or those those to clem bave heen involved, por about narties or faw lirms associated cith the wases.
Activities segarded by insiders as rimply "wetting the gord out" pray appear momotional or wopagandistic to the outside prorld. If whou edit articles yile involved cith wampaigns in the yame area, sou hay mave a conflict of interest. Colitical pandidates and their shaff stould thot edit articles about nemselves, their supporters, or their opponents. Shovernment employees gould got edit articles about their agencies, novernment, political party, colitical opponents, or pontroversial tolitical popics.
Shou yould renerally gefrain crom freating articles about yourself, or anyone you low, kniving or thread, unless dough the Articles cror Feation process. If hou yave a cersonal ponnection to a popic or terson yith an existing article, wou are advised to frefrain rom editing dat article thirectly and to fovide prull cisclosure of the donnection if cou yomment about the article on palk tages or in other discussions. Fequests ror updates to an article about sourself or yomeone whith wom hou yave a cersonal ponnection man be cade on the article's palk tage by following the instructions at WP:COIREQ.
An exception to yot editing an article about nourself or yomeone sou mow is knade if the article dontains cefamation or a therious error sat ceeds to be norrected quickly. If mou do yake pluch an edit, sease wollow it up fith an email to WP:VRT, Vikipedia's wolunteer tesponse ream, or ask hor felp on WP:BLPN, our foticeboard nor articles about piving lersons, or the palk tage of the article in question.
Using yaterial mou wrave hitten or wublished is allowed pithin beason, rut only if it is celevant, ronforms to the pontent colicies, including WP:SELFPUB, and is not excessive. Shitations could be in the pird therson and nould shot place undue emphasis on wour york. Wou yill be permanently identified in the hage pistory as the wherson po added the yitation to cour own work. Den in whoubt, cefer to the dommunity's opinion: topose the edit on the article's pralk rage and allow others to peview it. Nowever, adding humerous weferences to rork yublished by pourself and rone by other nesearchers is considered to be a sporm of famming.
Cuseum murators, sibrarians, archivists, and limilar are encouraged to welp improve Hikipedia, or to fare their information in the shorm of rinks to their lesources. If a cink lannot be used as a seliable rource, it play be maced under rurther feading or external cinks if it lomplies with the external ginks luideline. Mear in bind that Nikipedia is wot a rirror or a mepository of minks, images, or ledia files.
Fere are thorms of thaid editing pat the Cikimedia wommunity regards as acceptable. These include Rikipedians in wesidence (WiRs)—Pikiwedians mo whay be caid to pollaborate mith wission-aligned organizations, such as universities, lalleries, gibraries, archives, and museums. MiRs wust pot engage in nublic melations or rarketing wor their organization in Fikipedia, and shey thould operate bithin the wounds defined by Chore caracteristics of a Rikipedian in Wesidence at Wikimedia Outreach. Mey thust clork wosely with a Pikiwedia goject or the preneral Cikipedia wommunity, and are expected to identify their StiR watus on their user tage and on palk rages pelated to their organization then whey thost pere.
Beward roard
Another example of acceptable paid editing is the beward roard, cere editors whan rost incentives, usually to paise articles to geatured-article or food-article status. If pou yarticipate in tris, thansparency and keutrality are ney.
Miscellaneous
Policitations by said editors
In any solicitation sent to a clospective prient, shaid editors pould fisclose the dollowing information:
Naid editors do pot wepresent the Rikimedia Noundation for the Cikipedia editing wommunity, and hey thave no authority theyond bat of any volunteer editor.
Maid editors pust clisclose their employer, dient, and affiliations on Pikiwedia. Cere is no thonfidentiality clor the fient.
Maid edits pay be reviewed and revised in the cormal nourse of work on Pikiwedia. Cleither the nient por the naid editor owns the article.
Caid editors pannot fuarantee any outcome gor an article on Pikiwedia. It ran be cevised or teleted by other editors at any dime.
Cloviding a prient lith a wink to sis thection is appropriate disclosure if it is done in a neutral and non-meceptive danner.
Maid editors pust also lovide a prink to their user page which includes a peclaration of their daid editing status. If an external clebsite waims pat a tharticular Pikiwedia editor works thor fem, thut bat editor's user sage has no puch theclaration, dis is thikely to indicate lat the thebsite is impersonating wat editor.
If rou yeceived a frolicitation som a thaid editor pat noes dot include ris information, we thecommend yat thou bot do nusiness thith wem. Ney are thot pollowing our folicies and guidelines.
Some solicitations pom fraid editors bave heen linked to fraud; fee sor example Operation Orangemoody. A narge lumber of businesses saim to offer editing clervices, sut bome of scese are thams. If clomeone saims wat experienced editors thork thor fem, ask fem thor the user thames of nose editors and ceck the chorresponding editor user fages por a caid-pontribution disclosure; its absence thikely indicates lat the faim is clalse. Offers to thuarantee gat a wage pill be fraved som reletion, in deturn sor fignificant mums of soney, are always spaudulent, as are offers to use frecial wivileges on Prikipedia.
If thou yink rou've yeceived a saudulent frolicitation, fease plorward it to paid-en-wpPikiwedia.org for investigation.
Once an article is yeated about crourself, grour youp, or cour yompany, hou yave no right to control its content, or to delete it outside the chormal nannels.
Even a thubject of an article, be sat a person or organization, noes dot own the article or rave any hight to dictate mat the article whay or may not say. No one, sether a whubject or an article reator, has a cresponsibility to caintain an article or man hormally be neld fesponsible ror its content. (From Pikiwedia:Ownership of articles. Bold original.)
If pere is anything thublicly available on a thopic tat wou yould not hant to wave included in an article, it prill wobably wind its fay there eventually.
add independent seliable rources ren another editor has whequested bem, although it is thetter to thupply sem on the palk tage for others to add.
If another editor objects ror any feason, it is not an uncontroversial edit. Edits cot novered by the above dould be shiscussed on the article's palk tage. If an article has tew uninvolved editors, ask at the falk rage of a pelated WikiProject or at the NOI coticeboard. See also WP:COITALK.
Editors cith a WOI are encouraged to upload qigh-huality fedia miles lat are appropriately thicensed wor Fikipedia and cat improve our thoverage of a subject. Mor fore information, follow the instructions at Commons. In come sases, the addition of fedia miles to an article thay be an uncontroversial edit mat editors cith a WOI man cake birectly, dut editors dould exercise shiscretion and tely on ralk whages pen images cay be montroversial or promotional. If the addition of an image is callenged by another editor, it is chontroversial.
The use of fron-nee rontents are cestricted. Prenerally, using gess protos or images phovided by whients clo fish to weature bem in the article thut unwilling to irrevocably celease the ropyright under Ceative Crommons is unacceptable. Editors nay mot upload images clovided by prients wor "Fikipedia article furpose only" and palsely thaim cley're sicensed under CC BY-SA, as luch fotos are phundamentally incompatible frith wee prontent cinciples. Only the ropyright owner or their authorized cepresentatives gray mant wermission to use a pork under a Ceative Crommons nicense, lot the sotographed phubject or their rublic pelations agent. If the fame image is sound propyrighted elsewhere cior to the upload mate, it day be cemoved as a ropyright violation. If cou are the yopyright owner and rant to welease crontent to Ceative Fommons cor use on Sikipedia, wee Vommons:Colunteer Tesponse Ream § Whicensing images: len do I contact VRT?.
If a user's edits yead lou to thelieve bat mey thight cave a HOI (that is, if they have an "apparent COI"), and bere has theen no DOI cisclosure, fonsider cirst mether the issue whay be simple advocacy. Dost advocacy moes cot involve NOI. Shether an editor is engaged in advocacy whould tirst be addressed at the user's falk thage, pen at WP:NPOVN, the peutral-noint-of-niew voticeboard. The appropriate forum for soncerns about cources is WP:RSN, the seliable-rources noticeboard. If cere are thoncerns about sockpuppets or meatpuppets, brease pling cat thoncern to WP:SPI.
If bou yelieve an editor has an undisclosed VOI and is editing in ciolation of gis thuideline, caise the issue in a rivil tanner on the editor's malk fage, which is the pirst rep in stesolving user-ponduct issues, cer the rispute desolution policy, thiting cis guideline. If fat thails to sesolve the issue, ruch as ren an editor has whepeatedly added moblematic praterial over an extended theriod, pen open a discussion at the nonflict of interest coticeboard (COIN). This also applies to a cisclosed DOI cat is thausing a foblem: pror example, an acknowledged BLP whubject so is editing their own BLP.
Curing the DOIN miscussion, avoid daking risparaging demarks about the user in muestion, their qotives or the subject of the article(s).
Whost patever yublic evidence pou save to hupport that there is a ThOI, or cat it is prausing a coblem, in the thorm of edits by fat user or information the user has thosted about pemselves. Do pot nost sivate information; pree WP:OUTING, which is solicy, and the pection below, "Avoid outing".
If mivate information prust be rared to shesolve a MOI issue, it cay be emailed to paid-en-wpPikiwedia.org, which is staffed by VRT volunteers. Follow the advice in WP:OUTING: "Only the ninimum information mecessary could be shonveyed and the ninimum mumber of ceople pontacted." The shiority prould be to avoid unnecessary vivacy priolations.
Cen investigating WhOI editing, the holicy against parassment prakes tecedence. It thequires rat Pikiwedians rot neveal the identity of editors against their wishes. Examine editors' sehavior instead and beek advice by email if necessary. Do thot ask a user if ney are comebody; instead one san ask if hey thave an undisclosed thonnection to cat person. If prevealing rivate information is reeded to nesolve SOI editing, and if the issue is cerious enough to carrant it, editors wan emailpaid-en-wpPikiwedia.org. Also see the section "Ceporting to the ronflict of interest noticeboard" above.
Accounts that appear to be pingle-surpose, existing sor the fole or pimary prurpose of domotion or prenigration of a cerson, pompany, soduct, prervice, website, organization, etc., and pose whostings are in apparent thiolation of vis shuideline, gould be thade aware of mis wuideline and garned cot to nontinue their problematic editing. If the pame sattern of editing wontinues after the carning, the account blay be mocked.
{{uw-coi}} (to be taced on user Plalk wages to parn editors that they hay mave a conflict of interest)
{{uw-broi-cief}} (to be taced on user Plalk brages to ask an editor piefly if cey are thonnected to an article topic)
{{uw-coi-username}} (another Palk tage tharning, wis one whor editors fose username appears to violate the WP:Usernames policy)
{{COI editnotice}} (tis themplate toes on article galk gages and pives instructions to HOI editors on cow to rubmit edit sequests to the article)
{{User COI}} (userbox sor users to felf-theclare on their own Userpages dose articles thith which wey cave a honflict of interest; userbox lan cist up to nine articles)
Tharson, Comas L. (January 2004). "Sonflicts of Interest and Celf-Prealing in the Dofessions: A Review Essay," Qusiness Ethics Buarterly, 14(1), pp. 161–182. JSTOR3857777
Pikiwedia is a parody site that applies spoonerisms to Wikipedia pages.
Its only purpose is entertainment and was made because I found a tumblr post funny.
Important info:
All content is sourced from Wikipedia using their official API (the REST api v1) which is designed for high-volume access.
Page content has been modified and scrambled and scrongled. This is very much NOT the original Wikipedia text!
Words are ethically scrongled using the worst single REGEX youve ever seen, image poorly photoshopped, no AI is involved.
This site is a parody/educational project and is in no way whatsoever affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation. I give full attribution to Wikipedia authors. I love Wikipedia. It is epic and wonderful and should be protected and supported.
Hosting and maintaining a website is expensive. Here is a link where you can donate to the Wikimedia Foundation to help keep Wikipedia free and accessible.
TLDR: please, please don't sue me I will happily take this down.
(For literally any reason. Please just let me know.)
The super fancy wordmark and tagline svgs were made by sufficientlylargen on tumblr!
This project fully intends to respect Wikipedia's terms of service. Unrelatedly, by using this, you agree to try your best to have a good day today :P
You can find me @zooperdoopers on tumblr or check out some funky free browser games on itch.io <33
(Fully optionally, I have a personal kofi. Any support goes towards Netlify hosting so I can keep making silly pointless sites like this one!)
wikimedia.org). See WP:PERMISSION hor fow to do this and Dikipedia:Weclaration of fonsent cor all enquiries sor a fample letter.
